Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Full Leather Mistress

Fred Flintstone never existed

While the main reason that prompted me sometime study at the university was to have an additional name, did not take long to appear somewhat more social philosophy (increased by the literature and hormones) that as a force of fate pointed to a new goal to attain. Well, the fact is that life never understood why the work as we know it. Now say to yourself, is a total lunatic, a poor man who ate the cookie of the popular uprising and absolute anarchy. Well, I do not censor ideal, but at least apply a little patience and read what is on.
The year was 2001 and my head just ran the concept of social decay. This was based that at home, the discussions during the dinner always began and ended with trivial crap forming gigantic social parables. Father laburante and very free thinking and progressive career full brother in social, point freethought candy.
I went to college for the first time, and I remember a teacher welcomed in the media room / events, a certain Pugliese. At the end of his speech, he had done more than promote the real questions about the composition of society: what were these powerful motivations for everyone to accept their place and their duties with absolute obedience and serenity. I looked everywhere: magazines, newspapers, TV shows, movies. But I had read a few years before the cornerstone of this one-man war against the world: George Orwell's 1984. Someday I will tell you about this masterpiece.
In the same book, the British author called for the positive values \u200b\u200bin a dystopian world. Fiction is a story that a different world, although his true intentions begin charging a crazy, megalomaniac Stalin, the worst run through the West and lead to a thesis about the fear and personal sacrifice. All very sad. But when you discover a character as border as Winston, and realizes that with these eyes can see the world itself, the real, everything changes a little.



Fred Flintstone never existed. When I was little, I remember saying something. With ten years did not accept that people always have been equal at all times, just not right. Dependent on wage labor, the monogamous nuclear family, representative democracy, the nation state. Ten years after some literature and direct observation showed me faithfully.
The world as we know no more than seventy, at most one hundred years. So soon? Yes, really little. If you travel literature and historical sources that life will find friendly and funny that we get from Pedro, is fairly recent. And not bad so, since the division aristocracy - simple that existed during the British hegemony in the nineteenth century, based on power and wealth, leaving his place to climb the American West after World War II. A new world was born, a brave new world. New values, new forms, including a new language for thinking things. And then we come to the focus of all this blablabla: work. Two phrases
burn the heart of this study: one is a French guy from the late eighteenth century, which dictated that the minor work is an expression of will on the general singular, the nation state. Is small, almost imperceptible, but if we all push for the same side, national targets are possible. Utopian innocent enough, but genuine. It was building a new world. The second is from a neighbor, I do not know if it will live, because eight years ago went to Australia to be closer to theirs. "I do not know yet dignified work."
The conversion set of social events that take place and always have accelerated in the last thirty years exposed to the breakdown of social norms is underway, a new stage, a new way of thinking, talking, feeling. Postmodernism tell a few. The end of the world tell others. The fact is that this battle between what existed and what is coming increasingly noticeable in all forms of expression and divide both sides well defined. Fortunately, our generation is in and he gave me can enjoy the view without compromise: almost cynically choosing which parts of these two worlds are those who will live and which are not.
back, one of the reasons I found to study was to understand why people had to work. If anything the natural aversion to idleness and need to complete the production Marxist sufficient or if it was a social obligation, now almost non-existent (as the deficit of social rewards was the order of the day). I also worked, I read out, spoke to more than one, is that achieving board a first conclusion: the way of seeing things that reigned for a century is leaving these shores, and in the absence of a new model of society, there are no valid reasons to do one thing or another. And work, as ever was known, on its pedestal of universal value, not left out of this phenomenon.
However, if there is an engineering challenge currently facing is to find a new way to love the man that finds its fulfillment in the workplace, social, synchronized with the other sciences (social, philosophical, political , etc.) are addressed and established in the coming years. Until the engineer does not transform the speech "on industry's main resource is human "a practical reality, organized industry will decompose and will certainly be more than fiction book of theories.
What beautiful times ahead, times of optimism and pessimism intellectual emotional, that is, a fabulous show instabilities which one is the protagonist.


Aloha!


PS: This type of downloads will be counted, because I know they are dense and boring and do not raise the rating. But it's my blog and sometimes I have to post them.

0 comments:

Post a Comment